ICYMI: Axios: "Biden Team On the Rebound in Labor Supply"

In a new blog out today, the Council of Economic Advisers writes, "The prime-age labor force participation rate, which had taken more than a decade to recover to pre-Great Recession levels, has now returned to those very high levels. That labor force participation took only three years to recover to these highs is actually quite remarkable—and should reframe our thinking about the labor market in the aftermath of the pandemic."

As Axios reported, "contrary to a widespread economic narrative of the last couple of years," the U.S. labor market has "come into a better, non-inflationary balance because labor supply increased."

President Biden's economic policies and Investing in America agenda have driven a historically strong economic recovery that has created 12.6 million jobs and slashed unemployment to its lowest rate in more than 50 years. The benefits of this strong labor market have been widespread and helped those often left behind. As the CEA writes: "By many metrics, including those that formerly highlighted concerns about 'missing workers,' the current labor market is the best for working Americans in many decades."

Axios: 1 big thing: Biden team on the rebound in labor supply
[Neil Irwin, Courtenay Brown, 4/17/23]

One of the most persistent economic narratives of 2021 and 2022 was that of missing workers. Many Americans seemed to have simply vanished from the labor force during the pandemic, leaving employers in a lurch.

• That's no longer the case, White House economists argue in a new post presenting evidence that labor supply has returned to its pre-pandemic trend.

Why it matters: It would be way less painful if the U.S. labor market were to come into a better, non-inflationary balance because labor supply increased, rather than labor demand decreased.

• And contrary to a widespread economic narrative of the last couple of years, that seems to be happening — as the Biden team seeks to emphasize.

State of play: There has been ample speculation about why labor supply was depressed in the aftermath of the pandemic, the White House Council of Economic Advisers notes.

• Maybe fear of COVID, or long COVID symptoms, kept people out of work. Maybe it was excess savings from the pandemic, or reassessment of life priorities, or a "collective loss of work ethic."

Nah. It increasingly looks as if it just took some time for potential workers to match up with jobs and return to the labor force.

By the numbers: The share of prime-age workers — those between 25 and 54 — who are part of the workforce is now a tick higher than it was before the pandemic: 83.1%, compared with 83.0% in February 2020.

• The overall participation rate is down (62.6%, from 63.3% in February 2020), but that is due to the Baby Boom generation retiring. It's on track with what forecasters at the Congressional Budget Office anticipated before the pandemic.
• Moreover, immigration rates surged in 2022 after a pandemic collapse, also adding to the supply of labor.

What they're saying: "The swift but lagged response of labor supply to surging demand suggests that with time workers do respond to favorable economic conditions," the White House economists write.

• "There are many plausible reasons that explain why this response is lagged. Most obviously, the job search process itself is not frictionless; it may take workers some time to find a good job," they wrote.
• "Also, if households adapted to the pandemic in ways that can take a while to unwind (such as giving up formal child care), this would delay the labor supply response to growing demand."

The bottom line: "There's still an inaccurate view that prime-age labor supply is depressed, that immigration is way down, and that labor force participation rates aren't back on trend following the pandemic shock to our economy," Ernie Tedeschi, the chief economist at the CEA, tells Axios.

• In fact, he said, tight labor markets "pull folks back into the workforce and, while we have more to do to break down barriers to entry, the 'missing worker' story doesn't quite apply anymore.