EXCLUDING the District of Columbia, Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, Panama Canal Zone, Porto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, and Indians not taxed, the population of the United States, as reported for the 15th Decennial Census, taken as of April 1, 1930, was 122,093,455. This is the population used in the attached statement which shows the apportionment of the 435 Representatives in Congress among the several States.
Section 22 of the act of Congress [46 Stat. 26], approved June 18, 1929, provides that no State shall receive less than one Member. The method used at the last preceding apportionment of Members, referred to in Part 1 of Section 22, was the major fraction method, referred to in Part 2. Therefore, one column is shown giving the apportionment according to the major fraction method and the second column gives the distribution of Members according to the method of equal proportions, referred to in Part 3 of Section 22.
GAINS AND LOSSES IN APPORTIONMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES BY THE METHOD OF MAJOR FRACTIONS AND ALSO BY THE METHOD OF EQUAL PROPORTIONS. POPULATION BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT 1930 (APRIL 1)
______________________________________________________________
Method of Major Method of Equal
Fractions Proportions
Present Next Gains Losses Next Gains Losses
State House House House |
United States 435 435 27 27 435 27 27
Alabama 10 9 .... 1 9 .... 1
Arizona 1 1 .... .... 1 .... ....
Arkansas 7 7 .... .... 7 .... ....
California 11 20 9 .... 20 9 ....
Colorado 4 4 .... .... 4 .... ....
Connecticut 5 6 1 .... 6 1 ....
Delaware 1 1 .... .... 1 .... ....
Florida 4 5 1 .... 5 1 ....
Georgia 12 10 .... 2 10 .... 2
____________________________________________________________________ |
GAINS AND LOSSES IN APPORTIONMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES BY THE METHOD OF MAJOR FRACTIONS AND ALSO BY THE METHOD OF EQUAL PROPORTIONS. POPULATION BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT 1930 (APRIL 1)--Continued
____________________________________________________________
Method of Major Method of Equal
Fractions Proportions
State |
Present Next Gains Losses Next Gains Losses
House House House
_____________________________________________________________ |
Idaho 2 2 .... .... 2 .... ....
Illinois 27 27 .... .... 27 .... ....
Indiana 13 12 .... 1 12 .... 1
Iowa 11 9 .... 2 9 .... 2
Kansas 8 7 .... 1 7 .... 1
Kentucky 11 9 .... 2 9 .... 2
Louisiana 8 8 .... ... 8 .... ....
Maine 4 3 .... 1 3 .... 1
Maryland 6 6 .... .... 6 .... ....
Massachusetts 16 15 .... 1 15 .... 1
Michigan 13 17 4 .... 17 4 ....
Minnesota 10 9 .... 1 9 .... 1
Mississippi 8 7 .... 1 7 .... 1
Missouri 16 13 .... 3 13 .... 3
Montana 2 2 .... .... 2 .... ....
Nebraska 6 5 .... 1 5 .... 1
Nevada 1 1 .... .... 1 .... ....
New Hampshire 2 2 .... .... 2 .... ....
New Jersey 12 14 2 .... 14 2 ....
New Mexico 1 1 .... .... 1 .... ....
New York 43 45 2 .... 45 2 ....
North Carolina 10 11 1 .... 11 1 ....
North Dakota 3 2 .... 1 2 .... 1
Ohio 22 24 2 .... 24 2 ....
Oklahoma 8 9 1 .... 9 1 ....
Oregon 3 3 .... .... 3 .... ....
Pennsylvania 36 43 .... 2 34 .... 2
Rhode Island 3 2 .... 1 2 .... 1
South Carolina 7 6 .... 1 6 .... 1
South Dakota 3 2 .... 1 2 ... 1
Tennessee 10 9 .... 1 9 .... 1
Texas 18 21 3 .... 21 3 ....
Utah 2 2 .... .... 2 .... ....
Vermont 2 1 .... 1 1 .... 1
Virginia 10 9 .... 1 9 .... 1
Washington 5 6 1 .... 6 1 ....
West Virginia 6 6 .... .... 6 .... ....
Wisconsin 11 10 .... 1 10 .... 1
Wyoming 1 1 .... .... 1 .... ....
______________________________________________________________ |
APPORTIONMENT OF 435 REPRESENTATIVES BY THE METHOD OF MAJOR FRACTIONS, WHICH WAS USED IN THE LAST PRECEDING APPORTIONMENT, AND BY THE METHOD OF EQUAL PROPORTIONS, WITH TOTAL POPULATION OF THE SEVERAL STATES, NUMBER OF INDIANS NOT TAXED, AND POPULATION BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT __________________________________________________________________________ |
Apportionment of
435 Representatives
by method of --
Population Major frac-
basis of tions used Equal
State Population Indians apportion- in last pre- propor-
as enumerated not taxed ment ceding ap- tions
April 1, 1930 portionment |
____________________________________________________________________________ |
Total 122, 288, 177 194, 722 122, 093, 455 435 435
Alabama 2, 646, 248 6 2,646,242 9 9
Arizona ..... 435, 573 46, 198 389,375 1 1
Arkansas 1, 854, 482 38 1,854,444 7 7
California .. 5, 677, 251 9, 010 5,668,241 20 20
Colorado 1, 035, 791 942 1,034,849 4 4
Connecticut 1,606, 903 6 1,606,897 6 6
Delaware 238, 380 ...... 238,380 1 1
Florida . 1,468, 211 20 1,468,191 5 5
Georgia 2, 908, 506 60 2,908,446 10 10
Idaho 445, 032 3, 496 441,536 2 2
Illinois 7, 630, 654 266 7,630,388 27 27
Indiana 3, 238, 503 23 3,238,480 12 12
Iowa 2, 470, 939 519 2,470,420 9 9
Kansas 1,880, 999 1,501 1,879,498 7 7
Kentucky .. 2, 614, 589 14 2,614,575 9 9
Louisiana ... 2, 101, 593 ...... 2,101,593 8 8
Maine ..... 797, 423 5 797,418 3 3
Maryland ...... 1,631, 526 4 1,631,522 6 6
Massachusetts 4, 249, 614 16 4,249,598 15 15
Michigan ....... 4, 842, 325 273 4,842,052 17 17
Minnesota .. 2, 563, 953 12, 370 2,551,583 9 9
Mississippi .. 2, 009, 821 1,667 2,008,154 7 7
Missouri . 3, 629, 367 257 3,629,110 13 13
Montana .. 537, 606 12, 877 524,729 2 2
Nebraska .. 1,377, 963 2, 840 1,375,123 5 5
Nevada .. 91, 058 4, 668 86,390 1 1
New Hampshire . 465, 293 1 464,292 2 2
New Jersey .. 4, 041, 334 15 4,041,319 14 14
New Mexico . 423, 317 27, 335 395,982 1 1
New York 12, 588, 066 99 12,587,967 45 45
North Carolina 3, 170, 276 3, 002 3,167,274 11 11
North Dakota .. 680, 845 7, 505 673,340 2 2
__________________________________________________________________ |
APPORTIONMENT OF 435 REPRESENTATIVES BY THE METHOD OF MAJOR FRACTIONS, WHICH WAS USED IN THE LAST PRECEDING APPORTIONMENT, AND BY THE METHOD OF EQUAL PROPORTIONS, WITH TOTAL POPULATION OF THE SEVERAL STATES, NUMBER OF INDIANS NOT TAXED, AND POPULATION BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT--CONTINUED
________________________________________________________________ |
Apportionment of
435 Representatives
by method of --
Population Indians Population
as enumerated not taxed basis of Major frac-
April, 1930 apportion- tions used Equal
State ment in last pre- propor
ceding ap- tions
portionment
________________________________________________________________
Ohio 6,646,697 64 6,646,633 24 24 |
__________________________________________________________________
Herbert Hoover, Statement on the 15th Decennial Census and Reapportionment. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/212443